BAOLAIHUA
PRECISIONMANUFACTURING
2026-10-16 11:22:16
Click:
Ultrasonic welding joins two plastic parts by converting high-frequency mechanical vibration into heat at a designed contact feature. There is no consumable, no adhesive, no cure time — which is why it dominates the assembly of high-volume plastic housings.

Figure 1. Ultrasonic Welding Design Guide for Plastic Parts.
The catch: the weld quality is determined almost entirely by the joint geometry, which is fixed long before the welder is set up. Design the joint properly and the process window is wide and forgiving. Design it badly and you will spend the life of the product chasing a weld that will not hold.
The energy director is the key: it concentrates the vibration energy into a small volume so that melting happens at the joint, not in the bulk of the part.
| Material | Ultrasonic weldability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ABS | Excellent | Wide process window, the reference material |
| PS, SAN | Excellent | Similar to ABS |
| PMMA | Very good | Slightly brittle; needs careful amplitude |
| PC | Good | Higher amplitude and energy needed; can stress-crack |
| PC/ABS blends | Excellent | Very forgiving |
| PA (nylon) | Good | Hygroscopic — dry before welding; welds strongly |
| POM | Fair | Narrow window; high stiffness transmits energy well but degrades quickly |
| PP, PE | Fair to poor | Low stiffness and low friction loss make them difficult; often needs higher amplitude and a shear joint |
| PPS, PEEK | Fair | High melting point needs more energy |
| TPU, TPE | Poor | Too compliant — vibration is absorbed instead of concentrated |
| Glass-filled grades | Reduced | Filler reduces weld strength; joint geometry must be more generous |
Dissimilar materials: ultrasonic welding of different polymers only works if they are chemically compatible. The reliable pairs are the ABS/PC/PS/SAN family, and blends within the same family. PP will not weld to ABS. If you need to join dissimilar materials, plan for a mechanical joint (snap fit, screw) or an adhesive.
### 3.1 Butt joint with an energy director (most common)
### 3.2 Step joint
### 3.3 Tongue-and-groove joint
### 3.4 Shear joint
### 3.5 Staking and spot welding
| Feature | Value |
|---|---|
| Energy director height | 0.3–0.5 mm |
| Energy director included angle | 60°–90° |
| Energy director base width | 0.3–0.6 mm |
| Number of energy directors | One per joint (multiple directors split the energy) |
| Mating land width | ≥ 1.5 mm, or 1.5× the director width |
| Wall thickness at the joint | ≥ 2.0 mm for a reliable weld; up to 3.0 mm preferred |
| Shear joint interference | 0.2–0.4 mm |
| Alignment feature | 0.1–0.2 mm clearance on locating walls |
| Flash trap | A groove or shielded recess to contain displaced melt |
| Support beneath the joint | Rigid — thin unsupported walls deflect and absorb the vibration |
Two rules that are almost always violated:
| Setting | Effect |
|---|---|
| Frequency | 20 kHz for most parts; 30–40 kHz for small, delicate or thin parts (lower amplitude, less marking) |
| Amplitude | 10–60 µm; higher for PP/PE and high-melting resins, lower for brittle or delicate parts |
| Weld force | Higher force improves energy transmission but can deform the part; tune between 200 and 1000 N typically |
| Weld time / energy | Set by time, energy or distance. Distance (collapse) control gives the most repeatable result |
| Trigger force | Force at which the vibration starts — critical for consistent welds |
| Hold time | Time under pressure after vibration stops, to let the weld solidify |
| Horn material and shape | Aluminum or titanium; horn shape must not mark the cosmetic surface |
Prefer collapse (distance) control to time control. A weld controlled by how far the parts collapse together is far more repeatable than one controlled by a timer, because it directly measures the outcome rather than the input.
| Defect | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Weak weld / parts separate | Insufficient amplitude or energy; joint too compliant; no support under the joint | Increase amplitude; add a rigid support; review joint geometry |
| Inconsistent weld strength | Part flexing; poor alignment; inconsistent molding (short shots, warpage) | Fix part support and alignment; tighten part tolerances |
| Over-welding / flash | Too much amplitude, time or force; energy director too large | Reduce energy; shrink the director; add a flash trap |
| Surface marking on the cosmetic face | Horn contact mark; melt flowing onto visible surface | Change horn geometry; add a step joint; move the joint line |
| Cracking next to the joint | High amplitude on a brittle material; sharp geometry | Reduce amplitude; radius the joint; consider a different material |
| Weld does not develop (no melt) | No energy director; director too small; low force | Add or enlarge the energy director; increase force |
| PP/PE parts will not weld | Low-loss material with a butt joint | Change to a shear joint design |
| Weld stronger than the part but part is out of tolerance | Over-collapse compressing the assembly | Switch to distance control and set the collapse limit |

Figure 2. Quick reference: the key checks and reference values from this guide.
Ultrasonic welding is one of the most economical assembly methods available for plastic parts — one operation, no consumables, no cure, fully automatable. But it is unforgiving of a joint that was drawn without thinking about where the energy will go. Specify the energy director, give the joint enough wall and support, and keep the melt away from the visible face.
If you are designing an assembly that will be ultrasonically welded, our DFMA team will review the joint geometry and propose the welding method together with the rest of the assembly design.
Related Articles